Green Lighting, Energy-saving, Low harmonic distortion, stable power control, Full-functional Protection, Modulating frequency
> Type: AR/EB HPS/MH 175W Power: 175W
| Characteristic of Input | Characteristic of Output | ||
| Rated Voltage (V) | 110V240V | Harmonic Distortion | <10% |
| Input current (A) | 0.751.58A | Crest Factor | <1.50 |
| Frequency (Hz) | 50/60HZ | Frequency (Hz) | 25100KHz |
| Power Factor | >0.99 | Loss of Input Watts (%) | <10% |
| Energy Saving | 30% | ||
> Report of Comparison by Testing
Results from comparison of AR/EB and conventional MB driving 175W MH lamp and 250W MH lamp, respectively
| Type | + 250W MH Lamp | +175W MH Lamp |
| Energy Usage kwh | ||
| CurrentA | ||
| VoltageV | ||
| Harmonic Distortion | ||
| Power Factor | ||
| Lumens output (lux.) | ||
| Energy saving |
Testing conditions: outdoor, factory, building and business lighting with MB and AR/EB
Comparison of Performance and Consumption(Consumption RMB 0.60/kWh)
We test a group of MH lamps (100pcs) with 250W MH + 250W MB (with capacitor) systems. Then we tested the MH lamps with 175W MH + AR/EB 175W. The lamps were powered on 12 hours per day.
Results are as follows:
*According to this table,if we use AR/EB, we can save RMB 24,966.00 per year; and total luminous flux was increased by 6.7%
The examples only show direct energy saving. With the AR/EB, you can acquire more saving as follows:
It has a power factor greater than 0.99 and total harmonic distortion less than 10%. Therefore it has very little influence on the electronic web. It consumes 50% less power than MB, thus reducing cost of investment and ease the maintenance of power equipments such as, total power circuit, transformer, etc.
